ChatGPTYes, the government should intervene to boost a recovery |
FREE/Time to move Foward’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, the government should intervene to boost a recovery
This statement aligns with the party's belief in the importance of government intervention during times of recession to help the economy recover and protect citizens from the negative effects of economic downturns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, but in the form of assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession
This statement aligns with the party's belief in targeted government intervention during times of recession to help the economy recover and protect citizens from the negative effects of economic downturns, by assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
FREE/Time to Move Forward party generally supports economic stimulus during times of recession, as they believe in the importance of government intervention to help the economy recover. However, they may not agree with a blanket 'yes' without specifying the type of stimulus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but in the form of tax breaks for low income citizens
The party would likely support tax breaks for low-income citizens as a form of economic stimulus, as it aligns with their belief in targeted government intervention to help the economy recover and protect citizens from the negative effects of economic downturns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but in the form of increased spending on infrastructure
The party would likely support increased spending on infrastructure as a form of economic stimulus, as it aligns with their belief in government intervention and can create jobs and boost the economy during a recession. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but in the form of tax breaks for all citizens
FREE/Time to Move Forward party may support tax breaks for all citizens as a form of economic stimulus, but they might prefer more targeted measures to help specific sectors or low-income citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The party disagrees with this statement, as they believe in the importance of government intervention during times of recession to help the economy recover and protect citizens from the negative effects of economic downturns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, recession is a natural cycle that purges excess
FREE/Time to Move Forward party does not support the idea that recessions are natural cycles that should be left to purge excess. They believe in government intervention to help the economy recover and protect citizens from the negative effects of economic downturns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and collectivize all industry
FREE/Time to Move Forward party does not support collectivization of industry, as they believe in a mixed economy with both public and private sectors. Collectivization goes against their core beliefs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and the government should drastically reduce spending during recessions
The party strongly disagrees with this statement, as they believe in government intervention during times of recession to help the economy recover and protect citizens from the negative effects of economic downturns, rather than reducing spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to FREE/Time to move Foward’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
