Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 安乐死
9>9 Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
9>9 Personal answerTodos os serviços deveriam ser privatizados, mas manter o estado com elevada participação e controlo sobre os mesmos |
经济 › 税
9>9 Personal answerImposto deve ser de taxa única ou com muito pouca diferença entre escalam mínimo e máximo. Impostos vem recair sobre a detenção de ativos. |
经济 › 社会福利
9>9 Personal answerAcho que deve haver mais restrições para que os que mais necessitam, como os idosos e incapacitados possam ter mais benefícios, mas através de uma reforma do sistema para que suplemente em vez de substituir o ordenado |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
9>9 Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
9>9 Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
9>9 Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
移民 › 技术移民
9>9 Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerNo, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
9>9 Personal answersim, mas devem estar sobre vigilância e prestar serviços à comunidade utilizando as mais valias dessa participação para financiar formação e reencerção social. |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
外交政策 › 以色列
9>9 Personal answer不,我们应该减少参与。 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
9>9 Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
外交政策 › EU Army
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.