Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
9>9 Personal answer不,但如果致命疾病传染到了其他孩子身上,要让父母负刑事责任。 |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answer不 |
经济 › 政府支出
9>9 Personal answerDepende de que tipo de cortes esta em causa. Reduzir o número de carros patrocinado pelos contribuintes, reduzir viagens, e despesas de alimentação, habitação a tudo que seja deputado. Fazer reduções que não prejudique saúde, educação, cultura, segurança |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
9>9 Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
国内政策 › 视频监控
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only in places where crime rates are high |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
9>9 Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的,任何缴纳税费的人都应该有投票的权利 |
移民 › 技术移民
9>9 Personal answer增长 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answer不 |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answerNão, porque os países com uma economia semelhante á Rússia são autoritários mas trazem muitos bens económicos ao resto da população mundial o que são muito importantes , mas acho que devem ser sancionados em relação a materiais com intenção produzir armamento de destruição em massa. |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only in response to extreme situations |
环境 › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 以色列
9>9 Personal answer不,我们应该减少参与。 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answer不 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerNão acho apelativo moradores de rua dormirem em propriedade pública, considerando o facto de lhes ter sido oferecido casa, no entanto há que obter informações sobre o porquê e tentar encontrar um meio termo para ambos, se ambos cooperarem no senso comum |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
9>9 Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
外交政策 › EU Army
9>9 Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.