Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 安乐死
9>9 Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
经济 › 社会福利
9>9 Personal answerMais, e negar benefícios a desempregados, sem restrições físicas significativas, sem trabalho por mais de 2 meses |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
经济 › 政府支出
9>9 Personal answerSim, reduzindo o número de funcionário governamentais e despesas desnecessárias. |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
9>9 Personal answer不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
9>9 Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
科学 › 核能
9>9 Personal answerSim, desde que o investimento seja rentável |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
9>9 Personal answer不 |
移民 › 公民考试
9>9 Personal answer不,就连大多数公民都无法通过公民资格测试 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的,但是只有在他们在此国家生活5年后 |
移民 › 技术移民
9>9 Personal answer减少,公司正在利用这个计划来降低工资 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 举报人保护
9>9 Personal answerSim, mas apenas quando a informação é provada como verdadeira |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives |
外交政策 › 以色列
9>9 Personal answer不,我们应该减少参与。 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerSim, desde que não obstruam a passagem a outros civis |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answerYes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption |
外交政策 › EU Army
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.