Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 堕胎
9>9 Personal answerA favor, nao devia sequer ser uma questao uma vez que se trata de um individuo que terera de viver com as consequencias. Exemplo: se uma pessoa nao tiver condicoes apra ter uma crianca e melhor uma crianca crescer sem amor, carinho, refeicoes decentes, our abrigo? Que individuo e que saira desta falta de condicoes? |
社会 › 安乐死
9>9 Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
9>9 Personal answerLess, and there should be no privatization of the healthcare industry |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
9>9 Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
国内政策 › 视频监控
9>9 Personal answerNo, more police should be added to high crime areas instead |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 公民考试
9>9 Personal answer不,就连大多数公民都无法通过公民资格测试 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的,但是只有在他们在此国家生活5年后 |
移民 › 技术移民
9>9 Personal answer减少,而且政府应该更多地鼓励我国公民为担任这些工作做好准备。 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answer不 |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives |
外交政策 › 以色列
9>9 Personal answer不,削减所有的支持和帮助 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answerYes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerNao, se a opcao se apresentar para um abrigo deviam ser obrigados a aceita-la, a menos que haja uma razao valida (agressao no abrigo por parte de outrem, medo de violencia, etc.) |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
9>9 Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
外交政策 › EU Army
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.