Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 同性恋婚姻
9>9 Personal answerNon, permettons les unions civiles mais ne parlons pas de mariage |
社会 › 堕胎
9>9 Personal answerContra, mas permitir em caso de violação sexual , incesto , perigo para a mãe ou criança, no caso de deficiência do "filho" , falta de condições , antes das 12 semanas , e em caso menor de idade. |
外交政策 › 欧洲联盟
9>9 Personal answer不 |
医保 › 精神健康
9>9 Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
社会 › LGBT收养权
9>9 Personal answerSim , mas os institutos de educação devem promover o respeito das famílias de pais homossexuais. |
社会 › Hate Speech
9>9 Personal answerNo, and increase penalties for hate speech |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
9>9 Personal answer不 |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Weapon Sales Ethics
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
9>9 Personal answer不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
总统大选 › Mental competency testing
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
9>9 Personal answer是,只要报告离岸收入 |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
9>9 Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的,但是只有在他们在此国家生活5年后 |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
9>9 Personal answer不 |
移民 › 技术移民
9>9 Personal answerAumentar a quantidade de visto de trabalho temporário para trabalhadores naturais do próprio país. |
医保 › World Health Organization
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
外交政策 › European Union Countries
9>9 Personal answer不 |
社会 › Student Diversity Training
9>9 Personal answerNo, only for students that commit acts of discrimination |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answerNão, porque os países com uma economia semelhante á Rússia são autoritários mas trazem muitos bens económicos ao resto da população mundial o que são muito importantes , mas acho que devem ser sancionados em relação a materiais com intenção produzir armamento de destruição em massa. |
医保 › Medical Consensus
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
9>9 Personal answer减少 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only in response to extreme situations |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerAs cidades deveriam promover as empresas privadas mais pequenas com publicidade e reunir condições para essas conseguirem subir no mundo industrial ou comercial. |
经济 › State Ownership
9>9 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerDeviam ser construídos abrigos para sem abrigos |
经济 › Surcharge Ban
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Israeli Palestinian Conflict
9>9 Personal answerNenhum deles. |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
9>9 Personal answer不应当,我对当前的支出感到满意 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Post Brexit UK
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › EU Army
9>9 Personal answerNão, porque a organização (Nato) já existe e engloba vários países da Europa em juntar esforços militares, então criar um exército europeu não faria sentido. |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
9>9 Personal answerNo, classify cryptocurrencies as unregulated commodities |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.