Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 安乐死
9>9 Personal answerSim, mas com grandes restrições é só após um processo de validação muito sério. |
总统大选 › 有犯罪前科的政客
9>9 Personal answerSim, se o juiz assim o decidir, mas só para casos em que o crime esteja relacionado com funções públicas. Mas preocupa-me que isto possa servir para "proibir", sem boas razões, políticos de ter actividade pública. |
经济 › 社会福利
9>9 Personal answerDevem manter-se os benefícios existentes, mas deve haver programas de saída da pobreza. |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
9>9 Personal answerA UE deveria distribuir os refugiados equitativamente por país. |
移民 › 移民同化
9>9 Personal answer是的,但是政府应该提供免费的语言课程。 |
移民 › 公民考试
9>9 Personal answerSó para obter a nacionalidade portuguesa. |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的,但是只有在此国家生活10年后 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerNo, they should be captured and given a fair trial |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answerNão deve sancionar os governos, mas deve pressionar para que políticas que atentam contra os direitos humanos não sejam aplicadas, promover uma política comum de direitos humanos, assegurar o cumprimento destes em todas as acções directas ou indirectas da UE e tentar expulsar governos que atentem sistematicamente contra os direitos humanos (como o de Órban) |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 以色列
9>9 Personal answerPortugal deve apoiar a solução dos dois estados e concertar - se com outros países para promover o cumprimento dos acordos de paz. |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
9>9 Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
外交政策 › EU Army
9>9 Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.