Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
经济 › 政府支出
9>9 Personal answerSim, começando por manter apenas funcionários públicos competentes, que garantam efetivamente a prestação dos serviços, e despedir funcionários incompetentes. |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
9>9 Personal answer不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
国内政策 › 视频监控
9>9 Personal answerNão. Devia haver maior vigilância policial e os criminosos deviam ser presos, pagar indemnizações e custos do estado. Em casos de reincidência, deviam ser severamente punidos. |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
9>9 Personal answerNão, mas deviam ser escrutinadas pelas entidades competentes para aceitar ou não a sua candidatura. |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
9>9 Personal answerSó devia admitir migrantes que pretendam trabalhar, submetendo-se aos mesmos direitos e deveres dos cidadãos desse país, e que respeitem a cultura desse país. |
移民 › 移民同化
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerNo, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
9>9 Personal answerNão. Eles deviam trabalhar nas prisões para pagar os custos da sua estadia na prisão. |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answerAs pessoas desses países é que devem ter o poder para alterar governos autoritários. E a UE é muito tendenciosa, mobilizando-se por interesses económicos e não dos direitos humanos. |
医保 › 大麻
9>9 Personal answerÉ indiferente para mim. Mas considerando que outro tipo de drogas também são legais, como álcool e tabaco, também deveria ser. |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as the local environment is not compromised |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
9>9 Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
外交政策 › EU Army
9>9 Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.