Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › LGBT收养权
9>9 Personal answerNo, and adoption agencies should prioritize offering children to straight couples before offering to gay couples |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
9>9 Personal answerO rácio atual de cuidados de saúde entre público e privado parece adequado. O que falta no público é boa regras e gestão, não tanto subsídios ou mais injeção de dinheiro. |
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
9>9 Personal answer是的,它们对保护其他对接种疫苗来说还太小的孩子来说是至关重要的 |
经济 › 社会福利
9>9 Personal answerNão estou ainda suficientemente informado. |
经济 › 政府支出
9>9 Personal answerSim. Acredito que salários médios até podem e devem ser aumentados, mas deve-se pensar em gradualmente desenvolver modelos de maior abertura à automatização e menos burocracia, o que implicitamente significa já no curto e médio prazo, também na necessidade de um menor número de funcionários públicos, cuja eficiência na condução de determinadas tarefas é altamente dúbia. Ou seja, em suma, a introdução de um modelo público mais eficiente com menos despesa total. |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
国内政策 › 视频监控
9>9 Personal answerNo, more police should be added to high crime areas instead |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
9>9 Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 移民同化
9>9 Personal answer是的,但是政府应该提供免费的语言课程。 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的,任何缴纳税费的人都应该有投票的权利 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answerYes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › EU Army
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.