Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 安乐死
9>9 Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
9>9 Personal answerDeve haver ambos os dois, mas mais investimento e prioridade no público |
经济 › 税
9>9 Personal answerSim, de acordo com os rendimentos de cada um |
经济 › 社会福利
9>9 Personal answerApenas os benefícios devem ser para aqueles que têm dificuldades financeiras e deficiências. |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answerSim, mas respeitando a integridade física do animal |
国内政策 › 视频监控
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only in places where crime rates are high |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
9>9 Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 移民同化
9>9 Personal answer不 |
移民 › 公民考试
9>9 Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answerSim, se tiverem nacionalidade portuguesa e se forem contribuintes |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
9>9 Personal answerSim, se o crime praticado não for grave e se houver bom comportamento |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answerNão, mas devem ser tratados em centros de reabilitação e devem deixar de consumir aos poucos gradualmente |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answerSim, se houver violação dos direitos humanos |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives |
外交政策 › 以色列
9>9 Personal answer我们应该给予以色列和巴勒斯坦同样的支持。 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerNo, and make it a criminal offense |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
9>9 Personal answer应该,而且焚烧任何国家的国旗都应该是非法的 |
外交政策 › EU Army
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.