Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › LGBT收养权
9>9 Personal answersim, desde que sejam pais elegíveis ou seja que demonstram responsabilidade para cuidar de uma criança |
经济 › 公司税
9>9 Personal answer大型跨国企业有所增加而小企业低一些 |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 外国选举
9>9 Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answerNão, mas o governo devia melhorar o seu processo de verificação |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
9>9 Personal answer不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
经济 › 遗产税
9>9 Personal answer不是,所以的税率基于丰富的收件人,而不是死者的改革 |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
9>9 Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
9>9 Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answersim, mas depois de terem estado em Portugal 2/3 anos e saberem a cidadania portuguesa |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerNo, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer应该,这对于降低用药过量死亡率是必要的 |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerYes, if the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answerYes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption |
外交政策 › EU Army
9>9 Personal answerSim, mas o exército só poderia ser mobilizado em votação unânime dos países membros, e/ou ameaça a um membro da UE |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.