Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 精神健康
M>M Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
社会 › Hate Speech
M>M Personal answer不 |
经济 › 公司税
M>M Personal answer保持当前税率,但是要消除扣除额和漏洞 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
M>M Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
社会 › Gender Transition
M>M Personal answerYes, but only for non-surgical treatments such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
M>M Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
移民 › High Risk Immigrant Ban
M>M Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Animal Testing
M>M Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
外交政策 › 外国选举
M>M Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
M>M Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
M>M Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
总统大选 › Mental competency testing
M>M Personal answerNo, mental competency is too subjective and the testing process could be abused |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
M>M Personal answer是,只要报告离岸收入 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
M>M Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
移民 › 移民同化
M>M Personal answer是的,但是政府应该提供免费的语言课程。 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
M>M Personal answer是的,但是他们应该只被允许在当地选举中投票 |
经济 › 工会
M>M Personal answerHelp, but they exist to protect workers. Their impact on the economy is irrelevant. |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
M>M Personal answerNo, I think businesses should require vaccination but not by government mandate |
移民 › 技术移民
M>M Personal answer我十分满意现在的数量 |
医保 › World Health Organization
M>M Personal answer是的 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
M>M Personal answerNo, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
M>M Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 安全港
M>M Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
移民 › 双重国籍
M>M Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Ukrainian Defense Funding
M>M Personal answer是的 |
医保 › Medical Consensus
M>M Personal answerNo, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus |
外交政策 › 外国援助
M>M Personal answer提高,但是只对于那些没有对人权进行干涉的国家 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
M>M Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
M>M Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies |
环境 › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
M>M Personal answerNo, and we should be focusing more on improving public transportation |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
M>M Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 以色列
M>M Personal answer不,我们应该减少参与。 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
M>M Personal answerNo, But create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
M>M Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
M>M Personal answer不 |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
M>M Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
M>M Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
M>M Personal answer不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
M>M Personal answer减少 |
环境 › EV Subsidies
M>M Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
M>M Personal answerYes, but I would prefer if the protocol was created and secured by a government agency instead of a decentralized protocol |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.