Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 动物权益
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 欧洲联盟
8>8 Personal answer不 |
医保 › 精神健康
8>8 Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
社会 › 安乐死
8>8 Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
社会 › Hate Speech
8>8 Personal answerNo, and increase penalties for hate speech |
经济 › 公司税
8>8 Personal answer大型跨国企业有所增加而小企业低一些 |
经济 › VAT Rates
8>8 Personal answerDecrease, to provide economic growth |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
经济 › 经济刺激
8>8 Personal answer应该,但采用为受衰退打击最严重的领域提供帮助的形式 |
社会 › Gender Transition
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only for non-surgical treatments such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
8>8 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
8>8 Personal answerNão. As empresas de redes sociais deviam de ser responsabilizadas pela desinformação, pagando coima se necessário, o que levaria a uma busca extensiva de uma solução por parte das mesmas. |
外交政策 › European Commission
8>8 Personal answer不 |
环境 › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 外国选举
8>8 Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
8>8 Personal answer不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
经济 › 遗产税
8>8 Personal answer不是,所以的税率基于丰富的收件人,而不是死者的改革 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
8>8 Personal answer不,公司和商业机构也不应该 |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
8>8 Personal answerdeveria impor uma quota a países que não se disponibilizam a acolher um reduzido numero de migrantes |
移民 › 移民同化
8>8 Personal answer不,我们应该拥抱移民为我们社会的多样性作出的贡献 |
移民 › 公民考试
8>8 Personal answer不,就连大多数公民都无法通过公民资格测试 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
8>8 Personal answer是的,任何缴纳税费的人都应该有投票的权利 |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
8>8 Personal answer不 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
8>8 Personal answerNo, I think businesses should require vaccination but not by government mandate |
移民 › 技术移民
8>8 Personal answer增长 |
医保 › World Health Organization
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
8>8 Personal answerNo, they should be captured and given a fair trial |
外交政策 › European Union Countries
8>8 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
8>8 Personal answer不应该,但是我们应该增加在为犯人提供教育和技能培训服务方面的资金 |
医保 › 安全港
8>8 Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 双重国籍
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
8>8 Personal answer减少对外援助支出,直到显著减少我国的预算赤字 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
8>8 Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerYes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives |
经济 › State Ownership
8>8 Personal answerNo, this impedes technological progress due to competition being stifled |
外交政策 › Backstop
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 以色列
8>8 Personal answer我们应该给予以色列和巴勒斯坦同样的支持。 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answer不 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
8>8 Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
8>8 Personal answerNão. As empresas de mídia social deveriam de ter um plano regularizado e bem definido que proporcionasse uma publicidade politica igualitária sem a ocorrência de propaganda politica falaciosa. |
罪行 › Private Prisons
8>8 Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
8>8 Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
8>8 Personal answer不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
8>8 Personal answer减少 |
外交政策 › Post Brexit UK
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
8>8 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › EU Army
8>8 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
8>8 Personal answer不 |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
8>8 Personal answerNo, classify cryptocurrencies as unregulated commodities |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 22 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 15 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.