Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 安乐死
M>M Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
医保 › 精神健康
M>M Personal answer应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司 |
社会 › Hate Speech
M>M Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
经济 › 公司税
M>M Personal answer保持当前税率,但是要消除扣除额和漏洞 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
M>M Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
交通运输 › 公共交通
M>M Personal answerYes and no, state usually allows outdated equipment to stay on the roads because the lack of wanting to upgrade and/or needed maintenance. Private usually can keep cost down and have a lot more in-house, but usually doesn’t invest in city buses or local subways. |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
M>M Personal answerNo, the government has no right to regulate written word or private businesses. Fake tabloids have hung in our stores for decades, yet the government didn’t care then, why would they care now unless for more alternative motives. |
环境 › Animal Testing
M>M Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 北约
M>M Personal answerNo, not until other countries increase their financial contributions |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
M>M Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
移民 › 移民同化
M>M Personal answer是的,但是政府应该提供免费的语言课程。 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
M>M Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
医保 › World Health Organization
M>M Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
移民 › 技术移民
M>M Personal answer增长 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
M>M Personal answer不 |
医保 › 安全港
M>M Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
移民 › 双重国籍
M>M Personal answer是,除非他们实施了犯罪 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
M>M Personal answer减少,我们不应该给任何国家对外援助 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
M>M Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
M>M Personal answerYes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives |
外交政策 › 以色列
M>M Personal answer是的,但是尊重以色列的主权,不干涉它应该如何与邻国处理关系 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
M>M Personal answerNo, police have to encounter many issues throughout their careers. They have to be moderators, psychiatrist, law enforcers while trying to keep the image of a good guy. Police have to go through training courses to use weapons or negotiate, but never social working (I think). If we had some cops trained not to write tickets or arrest, but just be social workers, like detectives who solve crimes, maybe we could have more deescalations and proper handling of cases. |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
M>M Personal answer不 |
医保 › Vaccine Passports
M>M Personal answerControlling the movement of the people should be viewed as unconstitutional. Some countries ask you to get vaccines for malaria or yellow fever, but covid is similar to the flu. It’s can be deadly, but the flu claims thousands every year, but never require special identification to work, travel, or just enjoy life. |
罪行 › Private Prisons
M>M Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
M>M Personal answer应该,而且焚烧任何国家的国旗都应该是非法的 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
M>M Personal answer减少 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
M>M Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.