Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 同性恋婚姻
P>P Personal answerNo, marriage should be defined as between a man and woman. Civil unions make it seem acceptable to move in together, which leads to sin and the destruction of souls and the country. |
社会 › 堕胎
P>P Personal answerPro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child. If abortion besides in these extenuating circumstances is allowed, it should at least be banned after the first three months. |
社会 › LGBT收养权
P>P Personal answerNo, and only a married man and woman (or XXY with any other gender) should be allowed to adopt. |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
P>P Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
社会 › 女性在战斗中
P>P Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men. |
交通运输 › 公共交通
P>P Personal answerShort answer: Yes, but preferably privatize it. Long answer: Where I used to live, it took 2 hours to go by bus where it would take 30 minutes to go by car. So yes, public transportation needs to be improved. People need buses to get to work affordably, since having to walk limits their job choices and takes away time from work, family, and sleep. So if we do not have buses, then people will not be able to go to work, and that will be terrible for them and for the economy overall. So if the government does not privatize it, then yes, they should increase spending on transportation, or find a way to make sure the money is used more efficiently so they don't need more money. But it should really be privatized, as companies will keep it cheap to get more people using it and will improve service to be competitive, and it will be one less (major) thing for the government to spend money on. We should prioritize getting out of debt. |
环境 › Animal Testing
P>P Personal answerYes, including cosmetics, because had testing been done, it could have prevented the use of cosmetics that have now been proven to be harmful. Thus, its use in cosmetics is medical. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
P>P Personal answerNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional, but we should improve our ability to screen out potential terrorists |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
P>P Personal answer不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
社会 › 蒙面罩袍
P>P Personal answerYes, we must preserve religious freedom. With the current fear of Muslim attacks, virtually no attacker would wear clothes that easily identify them as Muslim anyway. |
环境 › 水力压裂法
P>P Personal answerNo, fracking uses fabric softener and other chemicals harmful to the wildlife |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
P>P Personal answerYes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives, and if the company promises to create new jobs by hiring many local residents |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.