Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 动物权益
JC>JC Personal answer是的 |
社会 › 安乐死
JC>JC Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
社会 › Hate Speech
JC>JC Personal answer不 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
JC>JC Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Animal Testing
JC>JC Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › European Commission
JC>JC Personal answer不 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
JC>JC Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 视频监控
JC>JC Personal answerYes, and more police should be added to high crime areas |
经济 › 遗产税
JC>JC Personal answerAbolir a pensão de viuvez, mas não a de sobrevivência. (Abolir a de viuvez em casos onde o cônjuge se encontra em perfeitas condições de trabalhar) |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
JC>JC Personal answer是,只要报告离岸收入 |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
JC>JC Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
JC>JC Personal answer是的,但是只有在他们在此国家生活5年后 |
医保 › World Health Organization
JC>JC Personal answer是的 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
JC>JC Personal answer不 |
医保 › 安全港
JC>JC Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
JC>JC Personal answer我对目前的支出额感到满意 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
JC>JC Personal answer不 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
JC>JC Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Backstop
JC>JC Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
JC>JC Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
JC>JC Personal answer是的 |
医保 › Vaccine Passports
JC>JC Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
JC>JC Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
JC>JC Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
JC>JC Personal answer增加,但是只能在我们的赤字得到大幅减少之后 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
JC>JC Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Post Brexit UK
JC>JC Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › EU Army
JC>JC Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
JC>JC Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.