Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 安乐死
8>8 Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
社会 › 工作场所性别多元化
8>8 Personal answerTodos devem estar nos altos cargos por mérito, não por cotas |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
8>8 Personal answerNão se trata de mais ou menos... talvez aprimorar os públicos seja o mais relevante |
社会 › Hate Speech
8>8 Personal answer不 |
环境 › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answerDeverão evitar usar animais para os testes. Excepto quando for completamente necessário |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 视频监控
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only in places where crime rates are high |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
8>8 Personal answerPublicamente não, mas deveria haver uma fiscalização feita pelo estado por diferentes pessoas para garantir o máximo de veracidade dos dados |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
8>8 Personal answerNão ter opinião. |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
8>8 Personal answerSem opinião |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
8>8 Personal answerNão cabe ao eleitor definir políticas externas deste género |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
8>8 Personal answer不应该,但是我们应该增加在为犯人提供教育和技能培训服务方面的资金 |
医保 › 安全港
8>8 Personal answerNão, mas cuidar destes casos, fazendo a devida reabilitação dos indivíduos, é apoiar por forma a conseguir ter uma vida e um trabalho digno |
外交政策 › 以色列
8>8 Personal answerSem opinião. |
罪行 › Private Prisons
8>8 Personal answerTenho certeza que não, serviços de segurança devem ser administrados pela gestão pública |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › EU Army
8>8 Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.