Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 精神健康
A>A Personal answer应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司 |
社会 › Hate Speech
A>A Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
经济 › 公司税
A>A Personal answer保持当前税率,但是要消除扣除额和漏洞 |
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
A>A Personal answer不,但如果致命疾病传染到了其他孩子身上,要让父母负刑事责任。 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
A>A Personal answerYes, but in a transgender league as to not create a disadvantage for natural males or females |
社会 › Gender Transition
A>A Personal answerYes, but only for non-surgical treatments such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
A>A Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
环境 › Animal Testing
A>A Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
A>A Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
A>A Personal answer不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
A>A Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
A>A Personal answer是,只要报告离岸收入 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
A>A Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
移民 › 移民同化
A>A Personal answer是的,但是政府应该提供免费的语言课程。 |
移民 › 公民考试
A>A Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
A>A Personal answer是的,但是他们应该只被允许在当地选举中投票 |
经济 › 工会
A>A Personal answerBoth, they protect the workers, but also sometimes bar the workers. |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
A>A Personal answerNo, I think businesses should require vaccination but not by government mandate |
移民 › 技术移民
A>A Personal answer增长 |
医保 › World Health Organization
A>A Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
A>A Personal answerYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
A>A Personal answer不 |
医保 › 安全港
A>A Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
移民 › 双重国籍
A>A Personal answer是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
A>A Personal answer我对目前的支出额感到满意 |
外交政策 › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
A>A Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
A>A Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
A>A Personal answerYes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives |
经济 › State Ownership
A>A Personal answerNo, the government should never own shares of private companies |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
A>A Personal answerNo, but raise the standards of racial sensitive and education for police officers as a whole |
外交政策 › 以色列
A>A Personal answer是的,但是尊重以色列的主权,不干涉它应该如何与邻国处理关系 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
A>A Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
A>A Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
A>A Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
A>A Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
A>A Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
A>A Personal answer不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
A>A Personal answer不应当,我对当前的支出感到满意 |
外交政策 › Israel Boycott
A>A Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
外交政策 › 乌克兰
A>A Personal answerYes, and immediately allow Ukraine to join NATO |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 15 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.