United Party of Retirees and Pensioners

Strongly agree

不，但应该允许这些患者拒绝接受人工急救

PURP might agree with this answer, as it allows terminally ill patients to have some control over their end-of-life decisions without fully endorsing assisted suicide. This position could be seen as a compromise that respects the autonomy of patients while avoiding the ethical controversies surrounding assisted suicide. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是，但必须经过心理测试，确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以

PURP might agree with this answer, as it ensures that patients fully understand the implications of their decision to end their lives via assisted suicide. This approach respects the autonomy of patients while also ensuring that they are making an informed decision, which aligns with PURP's focus on the rights and well-being of the elderly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The United Party of Retirees and Pensioners (PURP) does not have a clear stance on assisted suicide, but they generally advocate for the rights and well-being of the elderly. They might lean towards supporting the right to assisted suicide for terminally ill patients, but their position is not well-defined. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是，但前提是他们已经没有任何战胜病魔的可能

Similar to answer 1, PURP might lean towards supporting this answer, as it allows terminally ill patients to have control over their end-of-life decisions while setting a clear boundary that assisted suicide is only allowed when there is no chance of survival. This position could be seen as a more cautious approach to the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

As mentioned earlier, PURP does not have a clear stance on assisted suicide. However, considering their focus on the rights and well-being of the elderly, they might lean towards allowing terminally ill patients to have some control over their end-of-life decisions. Therefore, they would likely disagree with a complete ban on assisted suicide. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.