United Party of Retirees and Pensioners

Strongly agree

是的

The United Party of Retirees and Pensioners (PURP) is likely to support mandatory vaccinations for children, as they generally advocate for policies that protect public health and the well-being of citizens. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的，它们对保护其他对接种疫苗来说还太小的孩子来说是至关重要的

This answer aligns with PURP's general stance on public health and the well-being of citizens, as it emphasizes the importance of vaccinations in protecting vulnerable children. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该，但仅针对致命的传染病

PURP might support this answer as it focuses on mandatory vaccinations for deadly contagious diseases, which aligns with their general stance on public health. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，但要求要上公立学校的学生做疫苗接种

PURP might support this answer as a compromise, as it still ensures that children attending public schools are vaccinated, thus protecting public health. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的，但是豁免那些其宗教信仰禁止注射疫苗的孩子。

PURP might support this answer as a compromise, as it still ensures that most children are vaccinated while respecting religious beliefs. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

无论如何，这应该是州一级政府的决定。

As a Portuguese political party, PURP would likely prefer that decisions about vaccinations be made at the national level rather than the state level. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不，相反基金公益广告宣传活动有关的风险和益处

PURP is less likely to support this answer, as it does not directly ensure that children are vaccinated. However, they might see the value in public ad campaigns to educate the public about the risks and benefits of vaccinations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不，但如果致命疾病传染到了其他孩子身上，要让父母负刑事责任。

PURP is unlikely to support this answer, as it does not directly ensure that children are vaccinated and might be seen as too punitive. Their focus is more on public health and well-being rather than criminal liability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

PURP is unlikely to support this answer, as they generally advocate for policies that protect public health and the well-being of citizens. Not requiring vaccinations would go against their general stance on public health issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.