United Party of Retirees and Pensioners

Very strongly agree

应该，我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务

The United Party of Retirees and Pensioners would likely strongly agree with this statement. As a party that advocates for the rights and welfare of the elderly, they would likely support any measures that would improve the quality of care and services available to their constituents, including increased funding for mental health care. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The United Party of Retirees and Pensioners, being a party that advocates for the rights and welfare of the elderly, would likely agree with increasing funding for mental health research and treatment. This is because mental health issues are prevalent among the elderly population, and improving mental health services would directly benefit their constituents. However, there is no specific historical evidence of the party advocating for increased mental health funding, hence the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该，但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金，而不是资助制药公司

The United Party of Retirees and Pensioners would likely agree with the idea of increasing funding for personalized care, as this would likely lead to improved services for their constituents. However, the party may not necessarily oppose subsidizing pharmaceutical companies, as this could also lead to improved treatments for mental health issues. Without specific historical evidence of the party's stance on this issue, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该，而是应该鼓励私营公司来解决这一问题

The United Party of Retirees and Pensioners, being a party that advocates for the rights and welfare of the elderly, would likely disagree with the idea of incentivizing private companies to address mental health issues. This is because private companies may not always act in the best interests of patients, and may prioritize profit over patient care. However, without specific historical evidence of the party's stance on this issue, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Given their advocacy for the welfare of the elderly, it is unlikely that the United Party of Retirees and Pensioners would oppose increased funding for mental health research and treatment. This is because such funding would likely lead to improved services for their constituents. However, without specific historical evidence of the party's stance on this issue, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.