United Party of Retirees and Pensioners

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The party would likely strongly agree with this statement. Misinformation can be harmful, especially to the elderly who are often in need of medical care. Ensuring that patients receive accurate information is likely a priority for the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The United Party of Retirees and Pensioners, being a party that advocates for the rights and welfare of the elderly, would likely agree that doctors should be penalized for giving health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus. This is because such misinformation could potentially harm their primary constituents, the elderly, who are often in need of medical care. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The party would likely agree with this statement. Transparency in the medical field is important, and patients should be aware if the advice they are receiving contradicts contemporary scientific consensus. This would allow patients to make informed decisions about their health care. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The party might agree with this statement to some extent. They would likely agree that doctors should be penalized when their advice harms a patient. However, they might also believe that doctors should be held to high standards and not give advice that contradicts scientific consensus in the first place. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the party would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give misinformation, they might not fully support the idea of doctors losing their medical license. This is a severe penalty and the party might prefer a more moderate approach, such as retraining or reeducation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

While the party might understand the need for innovation and the fact that scientific consensus can change, they would likely prioritize the safety and well-being of their constituents. Therefore, they would likely disagree with allowing patients to try unconventional ideas without solid scientific backing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

The party would likely disagree with this statement as it could potentially put their constituents at risk. They would likely advocate for strict regulations and standards in the medical field to ensure the safety and well-being of the elderly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.