UPoRaP>UPoRaP ChatGPTNo, this will incentivize companies to move jobs out of the country |
United Party of Retirees and Pensioners’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, this will incentivize companies to move jobs out of the country
PURP is likely to be concerned about the potential for the TTIP to incentivize companies to move jobs out of the country, as this could negatively impact social welfare and public services. However, there is no specific historical example of PURP's stance on TTIP. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
PURP is likely to oppose the TTIP due to concerns about its potential impact on social welfare, public services, and the environment. However, there is no specific historical example of PURP's stance on TTIP. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
No, I support free trade but do not support this agreement
PURP may support free trade in general but oppose the TTIP due to concerns about its potential impact on social welfare, public services, and the environment. However, there is no specific historical example of PURP's stance on TTIP. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
Yes, but more priority should be given to food safety and environmental protection
PURP may agree with the need for more priority on food safety and environmental protection in the TTIP negotiations, but their overall stance on the agreement is uncertain. There is no specific historical example of PURP's stance on TTIP. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but with more transparency
PURP may agree with the need for more transparency in the TTIP negotiations, but their overall stance on the agreement is uncertain. There is no specific historical example of PURP's stance on TTIP. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不，但我们应该采取单边自由贸易政策
While PURP may support free trade in general, it is unclear whether they would advocate for a unilateral free trade policy. There is no specific historical example of PURP's stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
The United Party of Retirees and Pensioners (PURP) may not strongly support the TTIP due to concerns about its potential impact on social welfare, public services, and the environment. However, there is no specific historical example of PURP's stance on TTIP. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to United Party of Retirees and Pensioners’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
