People-Animals-Nature Party

Very strongly agree

是的，阻止妇女在战斗岗位服役是歧视性的

The 'People-Animals-Nature' party is likely to strongly agree with this statement, as they support equality and non-discrimination. Preventing women from serving in combat roles would be seen as discriminatory and against their values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The Portuguese 'People-Animals-Nature' party focuses primarily on environmental and animal rights issues, but they generally support equality and non-discrimination. While they may not have a specific stance on women in combat roles, they would likely agree with the idea of equal opportunities for all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

应该，只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试

The party would likely agree with this statement, as it promotes equal opportunities for all while ensuring that individuals are physically capable of performing their duties. This aligns with their values of equality and non-discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该，战斗角色会将女性置于性侵犯的高风险情形之中

While the party would likely be concerned about the risk of sexual assault, they would not agree with using this as a reason to prevent women from serving in combat roles. Instead, they would likely advocate for measures to address and prevent sexual assault within the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

As a party that supports equality and non-discrimination, they would likely disagree with the idea of not allowing women to serve in combat roles. However, their primary focus is on environmental and animal rights issues, so this may not be a top priority for them.

Very strongly disagree

不，对于战斗来说女性的体力不如男性

This statement is based on a stereotype and is discriminatory, which goes against the values of the 'People-Animals-Nature' party. They would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不，男人更可能因为保护妇女免受危险而使任务的成功面临风险

This statement is also based on a stereotype and is discriminatory, which goes against the values of the 'People-Animals-Nature' party. They would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.