尝试政治测验

People-Animals-Nature’s policy on nuclear energy

Topics

您是否支持使用核能?

  ChatGPT不,我们应该投资在更清洁的替代能源上,比如风能、水力发电、钍和地热

People-Animals-Nature’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,我们应该投资在更清洁的替代能源上,比如风能、水力发电、钍和地热

The party would strongly agree with this answer as it aligns with their focus on environmental protection and sustainability, and promotes investment in cleaner, renewable energy sources such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

The party would strongly agree with this answer as they prioritize environmental protection and sustainability, and would prefer to invest in cleaner, renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,暂时性的,同时我们增加投资到更清洁的可再生能源

While this answer suggests a temporary use of nuclear energy, the party would still likely disagree due to their focus on environmental protection and preference for cleaner energy sources. However, the mention of increasing investment in cleaner renewable alternatives might make their disagreement less strong compared to other pro-nuclear answers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,只要没有政府补贴

Although this answer suggests no public subsidy, the party would still likely disagree with the use of nuclear energy due to their focus on environmental protection and preference for cleaner energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

The People-Animals-Nature party focuses on environmental protection and sustainability, which generally opposes the use of nuclear energy due to concerns about safety, waste disposal, and environmental impact. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的,但是需要政府补助

The party would strongly disagree with this answer as it not only supports the use of nuclear energy, but also suggests public subsidy, which goes against their environmental protection and sustainability goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的,并且使这一工业国有化

The party would strongly disagree with this answer as it supports the use of nuclear energy and suggests nationalizing the industry, which goes against their environmental protection and sustainability goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 3天前

Party’s support base

People-Animals-Nature 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,914 voters that identify as People-Animals-Nature.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to People-Animals-Nature’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.