Inilah jawapan anda berbanding jawapan pengundi ini.
Sosial › Perkahwinan Gay
P>P Jawapan peribadiNo, marriage should be defined as between a man and woman. Civil unions make it seem acceptable to move in together, which leads to sin and the destruction of souls and the country. |
Sosial › Pengguguran
P>P Jawapan peribadiPro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child. If abortion besides in these extenuating circumstances is allowed, it should at least be banned after the first three months. |
Sosial › Hukuman mati
P>P Jawapan peribadiYa, tetapi hanya untuk jenayah yang mengerikan dengan bukti yang tidak dapat dinafikan |
Sosial › Euthanasia
P>P Jawapan peribadiTidak, tetapi mereka harus dibenarkan untuk menolak sokongan kehidupan tiruan |
Sosial › Hak Pengangkatan LGBT
P>P Jawapan peribadiNo, and only a married man and woman (or XXY with any other gender) should be allowed to adopt. |
Sosial › Kepelbagaian tempat kerja jantina
P>P Jawapan peribadiTidak, ahli lembaga sepatutnya menjadi yang paling berkelayakan tanpa mengira jantina |
Sosial › Atlet Transgender
P>P Jawapan peribadiTidak, atlet harus bersaing berdasarkan seks biologi yang disenaraikan di atas sijil kelahiran mereka |
Sosial › Wanita dalam Pertempuran
P>P Jawapan peribadiYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men. |
Pengangkutan › Pengangkutan awam
P>P Jawapan peribadiShort answer: Yes, but preferably privatize it. Long answer: Where I used to live, it took 2 hours to go by bus where it would take 30 minutes to go by car. So yes, public transportation needs to be improved. People need buses to get to work affordably, since having to walk limits their job choices and takes away time from work, family, and sleep. So if we do not have buses, then people will not be able to go to work, and that will be terrible for them and for the economy overall. So if the government does not privatize it, then yes, they should increase spending on transportation, or find a way to make sure the money is used more efficiently so they don't need more money. But it should really be privatized, as companies will keep it cheap to get more people using it and will improve service to be competitive, and it will be one less (major) thing for the government to spend money on. We should prioritize getting out of debt. |
Alam sekitar › Ujian Haiwan
P>P Jawapan peribadiYes, including cosmetics, because had testing been done, it could have prevented the use of cosmetics that have now been proven to be harmful. Thus, its use in cosmetics is medical. |
Imigresen › Larangan Pendatang Islam
P>P Jawapan peribadiNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional, but we should improve our ability to screen out potential terrorists |
Alam sekitar › Ban Produk Plastik
P>P Jawapan peribadiTidak, tetapi meningkatkan insentif cukai bagi syarikat yang membuat produk yang boleh terbiodegradasi |
Sosial › Niqāb
P>P Jawapan peribadiYes, we must preserve religious freedom. With the current fear of Muslim attacks, virtually no attacker would wear clothes that easily identify them as Muslim anyway. |
Alam sekitar › Fracking
P>P Jawapan peribadiNo, fracking uses fabric softener and other chemicals harmful to the wildlife |
Alam sekitar › Subsidi Korporat
P>P Jawapan peribadiYes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives, and if the company promises to create new jobs by hiring many local residents |
Inilah cara anda membandingkan dengan pengundi ini mengenai tema politik popular.
Berikut ialah sejauh mana anda bersetuju dengan pengundi ini mengenai setiap topik.
Berdasarkan 9 soalan yang disenaraikan agak penting kepada anda.
Berdasarkan 1 soalan yang disenaraikan kurang penting kepada anda.
Berdasarkan 4 soalan yang disenaraikan kurang penting kepada anda.
Berdasarkan 1 soalan yang disenaraikan kurang penting kepada anda.
Inilah cara anda membandingkan dengan pengundi ini pada paksi ideologi tradisional.
iSideWith.com ialah panduan pengundian paling popular di dunia untuk rakyat mencari maklumat tentang pilihan raya, parti politik, calon, daerah mengundi dan isu politik popular di negara mereka. Kami bebas dan tidak bergabung dengan mana-mana pelabur, pemegang saham, parti politik atau kumpulan berkepentingan.
Saya faham bahawa menghantar alamat e-mel saya membolehkan iSideWith.com menghantar pemberitahuan penting kepada saya melalui e-mel. Baca dasar privasi kami untuk mendapatkan maklumat lanjut.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. Hak cipta terpelihara. Penggunaan laman web ini merupakan penerimaan perjanjian pengguna dan dasar privasi kami. iSideWith.com mungkin memperoleh sebahagian daripada jualan daripada produk yang dibeli melalui tapak kami sebagai sebahagian daripada perkongsian ahli gabungan kami dengan peruncit. Bahan di laman web ini tidak boleh diterbitkan semula, diedarkan, dihantar, dicache atau digunakan sebaliknya, kecuali dengan kebenaran bertulis daripada iSideWith.com.