Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
9>9 Personal answerMais educação e planeamento; Análise de histórico de aborto de cada mulher Análise do contexto económico da mulher |
Social › Euthanasia
9>9 Personal answerCom avaliação psicológica; Com avaliação médica em que não seja possível recuperar a qualidade de vida, e que o sofrimento seja constante (sujeito a avaliação de determinados níveis) |
Education › University Tuition
9>9 Personal answerNo, but tuition costs should decrease based on family income |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
9>9 Personal answerNão é fácil porque a resposta não é A ou B mas sim A e B. É muito importante termos saúde publica mas se só existir saúde pública então haverá uma estagnação na inovação da saúde. Encontrar o equilíbrio é difícil mas é o único caminho. O SNS deve ser um serviço concorrente ao privado mas não deve exterminar o privado. A cooperação e equilíbrio entre os dois é necessário para o bem de todos e da evolução da saúde. |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Science › Mandatory Vaccinations
9>9 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Taxes
9>9 Personal answerDepende do que chamam ricos. Ricos são milionários? Em portugal parece que é rico quem ganha mais de 1500€ o que é ridículo. Nem com 5000€ mês devia ser considerado rico. O conceito de rico tem de ser muito bem ponderado e como somos tão pobres consideramos que até a classe média é rica. Os impostos para milionários sim, devia de aumentar. |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Transportation › Public Transportation
9>9 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Welfare
9>9 Personal answerMore, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income |
the Environment › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Government Spending
9>9 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Video Surveillance
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only in places where crime rates are high |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
9>9 Personal answerYes, and require a public audit each year they are in office |
Science › Nuclear Energy
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › EU Migrant Quota
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Citizenship Test
9>9 Personal answerYes, but it should only cover very basic and simple topics |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
9>9 Personal answerNo, and increase punishment for drug dealers |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
9>9 Personal answerNo |
National Security › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Crime › Prison Overcrowding
9>9 Personal answerNo, but we should increase funding to offer education and skill building services for prisoners |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
9>9 Personal answerSim mas tem de haver um objetivo de tratamento com algum grau de eficiência. |
Foreign Policy › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Marijuana
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only for medical use |
the Environment › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
9>9 Personal answerYes, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Crime › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
9>9 Personal answerNo, I don’t respect anyone who does but they should have the right to do so |
Foreign Policy › EU Army
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked least important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.