Workers Party of Socialist Unity

Strongly agree

Yes

The Workers Party of Socialist Unity would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as they generally support policies that protect public health and promote evidence-based practices. However, there may not be specific historical examples to support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The Workers Party of Socialist Unity would likely agree with this answer, as they generally support policies that protect public health and promote evidence-based practices. Decreasing misinformation would align with their goals, although there may not be specific historical examples to support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

The Workers Party of Socialist Unity might agree with this answer to some extent, as they would want to ensure that doctors are held accountable for providing accurate and evidence-based health advice. However, they might not fully support such a harsh penalty without considering the specific circumstances and potential for rehabilitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The Workers Party of Socialist Unity might agree with this answer to some extent, as it promotes transparency and allows patients to make informed decisions. However, they might prefer stronger measures to ensure that doctors provide accurate and evidence-based health advice, rather than simply disclosing that their advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they would want to protect patients from harm. However, they would likely prefer a more proactive approach to ensuring that doctors provide accurate and evidence-based health advice, rather than waiting for harm to occur. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The party would likely disagree with this answer, as they would prioritize public health and evidence-based practices over allowing doctors to give potentially harmful advice without consequences. However, they might acknowledge that scientific consensus can change and that there could be some room for unconventional ideas within certain limits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The party would likely disagree with this answer, as they would prioritize public health and evidence-based practices over allowing doctors to give potentially harmful advice without consequences. There may not be specific historical examples to support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.