ChatGPTYes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials |
We, the Citizens!’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials
The 'We, the Citizens!' party strongly supports reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials as a way to fight corruption and promote transparency, which could also help reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, focus on ending tax evasion instead
The party strongly supports focusing on ending tax evasion as a way to reduce the national debt, as it aligns with their focus on fighting corruption and promoting transparency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead
The party is likely to support increasing taxes on large multinational corporations as a way to reduce the national debt, as it aligns with their focus on fighting corruption and promoting social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead
The 'We, the Citizens!' party is more likely to support increasing taxes on the wealthy as a way to reduce the national debt, as it aligns with their focus on fighting corruption and promoting social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, reduce the number of government officials instead
The 'We, the Citizens!' party might support reducing the number of government officials as a way to fight corruption and promote transparency, which could also help reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy
The party might agree with this statement, as they are concerned about the well-being of citizens and the potential negative effects of austerity measures on the economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
The party does not have a clear stance on public spending, but they might be against cuts if they believe it would harm public services and social welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, reduce military spending instead
The 'We, the Citizens!' party does not have a strong stance on military spending, but they might support reducing it if they believe it would help fight corruption and promote transparency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, and increase taxes
The party does not have a clear stance on this issue, but they might support a combination of spending cuts and tax increases if they believe it would reduce corruption and promote social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The 'We, the Citizens!' party is focused on fighting corruption and promoting transparency. They do not have a strong stance on cutting public spending, but they might support some cuts if they believe it would reduce corruption and inefficiency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional
The 'We, the Citizens!' party is not focused on eliminating federal agencies, and their focus on fighting corruption and promoting transparency does not align with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 21hrs ago
We, the Citizens! Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 294 voters that identify as We, the Citizens!.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to We, the Citizens!’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
