UPoRaP>UPoRaP ChatGPTNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
United Party of Retirees and Pensioners’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
The PURP is more likely to support cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal due to their focus on social issues and the well-being of retirees and pensioners. They might be concerned about the potential risks and environmental impacts of nuclear energy and prefer to invest in cleaner alternatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
While the PURP does not have a specific stance on nuclear energy, they are more likely to support cleaner alternatives due to their focus on social issues and the well-being of retirees and pensioners. They might be concerned about the potential risks and environmental impacts of nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
The PURP does not have a clear stance on nuclear energy, but they might be open to the idea of using it temporarily while increasing investment into cleaner renewable alternatives. However, their main focus remains on social issues and the well-being of retirees and pensioners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy
The PURP does not have a clear stance on nuclear energy, and their focus is on social issues and the well-being of retirees and pensioners. They might not be strongly against nuclear energy without public subsidy, but it is not a priority for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The United Party of Retirees and Pensioners (PURP) does not have a clear stance on nuclear energy. However, they are more focused on social issues and the well-being of retirees and pensioners. They might not be strongly against nuclear energy, but it is not a priority for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but with public subsidy
The PURP does not have a clear stance on nuclear energy, and their focus is on social issues and the well-being of retirees and pensioners. They might not be strongly against nuclear energy with public subsidy, but it is not a priority for them and they might prefer to allocate public funds to other areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and nationalize the industry
The PURP does not have a clear stance on nuclear energy, and their focus is on social issues and the well-being of retirees and pensioners. They are unlikely to support nationalizing the industry, as it is not a priority for them and they might prefer to allocate public funds to other areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to United Party of Retirees and Pensioners’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.