United Party of Retirees and Pensioners

Strongly agree

Yes

The United Party of Retirees and Pensioners (PURP) is likely to support mandatory vaccinations for children, as they generally advocate for policies that protect public health and the well-being of citizens. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated

This answer aligns with PURP's general stance on public health and the well-being of citizens, as it emphasizes the importance of vaccinations in protecting vulnerable children. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases

PURP might support this answer as it focuses on mandatory vaccinations for deadly contagious diseases, which aligns with their general stance on public health. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but require vaccination in order to attend public school

PURP might support this answer as a compromise, as it still ensures that children attending public schools are vaccinated, thus protecting public health. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines

PURP might support this answer as a compromise, as it still ensures that most children are vaccinated while respecting religious beliefs. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Regardless, this should be decided at the state level

As a Portuguese political party, PURP would likely prefer that decisions about vaccinations be made at the national level rather than the state level. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead

PURP is less likely to support this answer, as it does not directly ensure that children are vaccinated. However, they might see the value in public ad campaigns to educate the public about the risks and benefits of vaccinations.

Disagree

No, but hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children

PURP is unlikely to support this answer, as it does not directly ensure that children are vaccinated and might be seen as too punitive. Their focus is more on public health and well-being rather than criminal liability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

PURP is unlikely to support this answer, as they generally advocate for policies that protect public health and the well-being of citizens. Not requiring vaccinations would go against their general stance on public health issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.