United Party of Retirees and Pensioners

Strongly agree

Yes, we should always promote diplomatic peace talks during foreign conflicts

Promoting diplomatic peace talks aligns with a general preference for stability and peace, which can have indirect benefits for domestic issues such as economic stability. Even though the party's primary focus is not on foreign policy, supporting peace initiatives could be seen as beneficial for creating a stable international environment that indirectly benefits their constituents. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The United Party of Retirees and Pensioners, focusing on domestic issues such as pensions and retiree rights, might see the value in supporting peace talks as a way to maintain global stability, which can indirectly affect national economic stability and safety. However, their primary focus on domestic issues might not make this a top priority, hence the score is not maximally positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, we should not get involved in foreign conflicts

This answer might resonate somewhat with a party focused on domestic issues, as it suggests avoiding entanglement in foreign conflicts. However, completely disengaging from international diplomacy does not align with a broader understanding of how global stability affects domestic welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, only if it is an immediate threat to our safety

While the party might prioritize domestic issues, they could see the value in engaging in peace talks if there were a direct threat to national safety. However, this stance is conditional and does not reflect a proactive approach to foreign policy, which might not be a primary concern for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the party's likely focus on internal matters and the well-being of its constituents, outright opposition to peace talks would be inconsistent with a general preference for stability and peace, which indirectly benefits economic and social conditions at home. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.