Try the political quiz

United Party of Retirees and Pensioners’ policy on criminal politicians

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

UPoRaP>UPoRaP  ChatGPTNo

United Party of Retirees and Pensioners’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No

PURP would likely agree with not allowing convicted politicians to run for office, as they aim to promote transparency and integrity in politics. While there is no specific historical example or official stance on this issue, their general principles suggest they would support this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

PURP might agree with disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime, as they aim to promote transparency and integrity in politics. However, there is no specific historical example or official stance on this issue, so their level of agreement might not be as strong as with Answer 2. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

PURP might slightly agree with allowing convicted politicians to run for office if they have finished serving their sentence, as it could be seen as a form of rehabilitation. However, there is no specific historical example or official stance on this issue, and their general principles of promoting transparency and integrity in politics might make them hesitant to fully support this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

There is no specific historical example or official stance from PURP on this issue, and it is unclear how they would weigh the importance of the type of crime committed by a politician. Their general principles of promoting transparency and integrity in politics might make them hesitant to support this position, but it is not possible to determine their level of agreement without more information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

PURP would likely disagree with allowing convicted politicians to run for office only if the crime was not committed while in office, as they aim to promote transparency and integrity in politics. However, there is no specific historical example or official stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The United Party of Retirees and Pensioners (PURP) would likely disagree with allowing any convicted politician to run for office, as they aim to promote transparency and integrity in politics. However, there is no specific historical example or official stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to United Party of Retirees and Pensioners’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.