Try the political quiz

United Party of Retirees and Pensioners’ policy on bonus cap

Topics

Should bankers’ bonuses be capped at 100% of their pay?

UPoRaP>UPoRaP  ChatGPTYes, and lower the cap to 20%

United Party of Retirees and Pensioners’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, and lower the cap to 20%

PURP may support lowering the cap on bankers' bonuses to 20% of their pay, as they generally advocate for social justice and reducing income inequality. This would be a more aggressive stance on limiting excessive bonuses. However, there is no specific historical example of PURP taking a stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The United Party of Retirees and Pensioners (PURP) may agree with capping bankers' bonuses at 100% of their pay, as they generally advocate for social justice and reducing income inequality. However, there is no specific historical example of PURP taking a stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and lower the cap to 50%

PURP may support lowering the cap on bankers' bonuses to 50% of their pay, as they generally advocate for social justice and reducing income inequality. This would be a more moderate stance on limiting excessive bonuses. However, there is no specific historical example of PURP taking a stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and nationalise the banks

PURP may support nationalizing banks as a way to control bankers' bonuses and promote social justice. However, this stance is not a primary focus of the party, and there is no specific historical example of PURP taking a stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

PURP is unlikely to support not capping bankers' bonuses, as they generally advocate for social justice and reducing income inequality. However, there is no specific historical example of PURP taking a stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, any worker should be rewarded based on their success

PURP is unlikely to support the idea that any worker should be rewarded based on their success without any limitations, as they generally advocate for social justice and reducing income inequality. This stance would allow for potentially excessive bonuses. However, there is no specific historical example of PURP taking a stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to United Party of Retirees and Pensioners’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.