United Party of Retirees and Pensioners

Strongly agree

Yes

The United Party of Retirees and Pensioners, being a party that advocates for the rights and welfare of retirees and pensioners, would likely support laws that protect whistleblowers. This is because whistleblowers often expose corruption or wrongdoing that can negatively impact the welfare of retirees and pensioners. However, there is no specific historical evidence to suggest a strong stance on this issue, hence the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

The United Party of Retirees and Pensioners would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their general stance on protecting individual rights and welfare, while also respecting the rule of law. However, without specific historical evidence, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

While the party would likely agree with the need to protect national security, their primary focus is on the rights and welfare of individuals, which includes whistleblowers. Therefore, they would likely somewhat agree with this statement, but not strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but reduce their sentences

While the party might not be completely against reducing sentences for whistleblowers, their primary focus would likely be on preventing any punishment for whistleblowers in the first place. Therefore, they would likely somewhat disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given their general stance on protecting the rights and welfare of individuals, it is unlikely that the United Party of Retirees and Pensioners would oppose laws protecting whistleblowers. However, without specific historical evidence, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.