United Party of Retirees and Pensioners

Strongly agree

No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications

The party would likely strongly agree with this statement as it aligns with their advocacy for individual rights and freedoms, including the right to privacy. However, the score is not at the maximum as the party has not explicitly stated its position on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The party would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with their advocacy for individual rights and freedoms. However, the score is not at the maximum as the party has not explicitly stated its position on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only by court order

The party might agree with this statement as it provides a balance between individual privacy rights and the need for surveillance in certain cases, with the added safeguard of a court order. However, the party has not explicitly stated its position on this issue.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds

The party might somewhat agree with this statement as it provides a balance between individual privacy rights and the need for surveillance in certain cases. However, the party has not explicitly stated its position on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism

While the party might understand the need for surveillance in the context of combating terrorism, it would likely still prioritize individual privacy rights. Therefore, they might somewhat disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The United Party of Retirees and Pensioners, being a party that advocates for the rights and welfare of retirees and pensioners, would likely prioritize individual privacy rights over unrestricted government surveillance. There is no specific historical stance of the party on this issue, but this is inferred from their general advocacy for individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.