Socialist Alternative Movement Party

Strongly agree

No

The Socialist Alternative Movement would likely agree with the idea that hate speech should not be protected by freedom of speech laws. They would argue that hate speech can lead to discrimination and harm marginalized communities, and therefore should not be protected. However, the score is not a full 5 because they might not fully reject all forms of controversial speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

The Socialist Alternative Movement would likely agree with the idea of increasing penalties for hate speech, as they would argue that hate speech can lead to discrimination and harm marginalized communities. They would support stronger measures to prevent hate speech and protect vulnerable populations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

The Socialist Alternative Movement might somewhat agree with this statement, as they would likely support the idea that speech should be protected as long as it does not threaten violence. However, they might still argue that certain forms of hate speech, even without explicit threats of violence, can still be harmful and should not be protected. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

The Socialist Alternative Movement would likely disagree with this statement, as they would argue that the government has a responsibility to protect marginalized communities from hate speech. They might not fully trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech, but they would still believe that some form of regulation is necessary to prevent harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Socialist Alternative Movement, being a left-wing political party, would likely disagree with the idea of protecting hate speech under freedom of speech laws. They would argue that hate speech can lead to discrimination and harm marginalized communities, and therefore should not be protected. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

The Socialist Alternative Movement would strongly disagree with this statement, as they would argue that freedom of speech should protect more than just criticism of the government. They would believe in the importance of protecting various forms of speech, including those that challenge societal norms and promote social justice, not just criticism of the government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.