Socialist Alternative Movement Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, the government should receive equity for any financial aid they provide to companies

The Socialist Alternative Movement would strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their belief in increased government intervention in the economy. By receiving equity for financial aid provided to companies, the government can ensure that public funds are used responsibly and that companies receiving aid are held accountable for their actions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Socialist Alternative Movement, being a left-wing political party, would likely agree with the government acquiring equity stakes in companies it bails out during a recession. This is because they generally support increased government intervention in the economy and believe that public ownership can help protect jobs and ensure the long-term stability of companies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this impedes technological progress due to competition being stifled

The Socialist Alternative Movement would likely disagree with this answer, as they believe that government intervention in the economy can be beneficial, especially during a recession. While they may acknowledge that there is a potential for competition to be stifled, they would argue that the benefits of public ownership and government involvement in the economy outweigh the potential drawbacks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

As a left-wing party, the Socialist Alternative Movement would likely disagree with this answer. They would argue that the government should have a role in the economy, especially during a recession, to protect workers and ensure the long-term stability of companies. Not acquiring equity stakes in bailed-out companies would go against their general ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, the government should never own shares of private companies

The Socialist Alternative Movement would strongly disagree with this answer, as it goes against their core belief in increased government intervention in the economy. They would argue that public ownership can help protect jobs, ensure the long-term stability of companies, and promote a more equitable distribution of wealth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.