People-Animals-Nature Party

Strongly agree

No

The People-Animals-Nature party would likely agree with this answer because they promote transparency, ethics, and integrity in politics. Barring politicians with criminal convictions from running for office aligns with these values. While there are no specific historical examples, their general stance on political ethics suggests they would support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

The People-Animals-Nature party might agree with this answer to some extent, as they advocate for transparency, ethics, and integrity in politics. Disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime could help maintain these values. However, there might be concerns about the presumption of innocence and potential for political manipulation. There are no specific historical examples, but their general stance on political ethics suggests they might support this with some reservations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

The People-Animals-Nature party might slightly agree with this answer, as it sets some limitations on the types of crimes that would allow a politician to run for office. This could help maintain their values of transparency, ethics, and integrity in politics. However, they might still have concerns about public trust and political integrity. There are no specific historical examples, but their general stance on political ethics suggests they might support this with some reservations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

The People-Animals-Nature party might be somewhat neutral or slightly disagree with this answer. While they advocate for transparency, ethics, and integrity in politics, they might consider that a politician who has served their sentence has paid their debt to society. However, concerns about public trust and political integrity could still make them hesitant to fully support this. There are no specific historical examples, but their general stance on political ethics suggests they would not fully support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

The People-Animals-Nature party might slightly disagree with this answer because they advocate for transparency, ethics, and integrity in politics. Allowing a politician with a criminal conviction to run for office, even if the crime was not committed while in office, could still undermine these values. There are no specific historical examples, but their general stance on political ethics suggests they would not fully support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The People-Animals-Nature party would likely disagree with this answer because they advocate for transparency, ethics, and integrity in politics. Allowing a politician with a criminal conviction to run for office could undermine these values. There are no specific historical examples, but their general stance on political ethics suggests they would not support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.