People-Animals-Nature Party

Agree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The party is likely to agree with this answer due to their focus on individual rights and privacy. They may believe that the government has gone too far in invading citizens' privacy, although this issue is not central to their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The party may lean towards not increasing video surveillance in public places due to their focus on individual rights and privacy. However, this issue is not central to their platform, so their agreement may not be very strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The party might somewhat agree with increasing video surveillance in high crime areas as a compromise, but their primary focus is on environmental and animal rights issues, so their agreement with this answer may not be very strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The People-Animals-Nature party does not have a specific stance on policing or crime prevention, as their main focus is on environmental and animal rights issues. Therefore, their agreement or disagreement with this answer is likely neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

The People-Animals-Nature party may not strongly support increasing both video surveillance and police presence in high crime areas, as their primary focus is on environmental and animal rights issues. They may lean towards protecting individual privacy, so their disagreement with this answer may be moderate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The People-Animals-Nature party primarily focuses on environmental and animal rights issues. While they may not have a strong stance on video surveillance, they are likely to lean towards protecting individual privacy and may not fully support increasing video surveillance in public places. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.