People-Animals-Nature Party

Very strongly agree

No

PAN's commitment to fairness and equal rights suggests they would strongly oppose any measures that would allow ISPs to manipulate internet speeds based on payment, which would undermine the principle of net neutrality and create a tiered internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

PAN's principles of equality and fairness would support the idea of treating all internet traffic equally. This stance is consistent with their broader commitment to ensuring open and equal access to resources and services for all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This statement aligns with PAN's advocacy for a fair and open internet. They would likely agree that allowing ISPs to prioritize traffic could lead to reduced competition, artificial scarcity, and higher prices, which would be contrary to their values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While PAN might see some merit in prioritizing traffic by type to ensure efficient use of resources, they would likely be concerned about the potential for abuse and the slippery slope towards a less open and equal internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Although a pay-per-quality model might seem like a fair approach, PAN would likely be skeptical of any system that allows for potential inequality and prioritizes access based on ability to pay, which could disadvantage smaller entities and individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The People-Animals-Nature Party (PAN) has a history of advocating for equality and fairness, principles that would likely extend to their stance on net neutrality. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to certain websites at the expense of others would go against these principles by creating an unequal internet landscape. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

PAN would likely argue that making the internet faster and more reliable for users should not come at the cost of fairness and equality. They would probably see this approach as benefiting larger, wealthier companies at the expense of smaller entities and individual users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.