Earth Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

The Earth Party would likely strongly agree with this statement as it aligns with their values of transparency, accountability, and legality. It suggests that whistleblowers should be protected, but only if they obtained their information legally, which is a stance that respects both the rule of law and the role of whistleblowers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Earth Party, being an environmental and progressive party, would likely support laws protecting whistleblowers as they often expose corporate or governmental misconduct, which aligns with the party's values of transparency and accountability. However, there is no specific historical evidence to suggest a strong stance on this issue, hence the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

The Earth Party would likely agree with this statement as it balances the need for transparency and accountability with concerns for national security. However, the party might argue that 'national security' should not be used as a blanket excuse to suppress whistleblowing, hence the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but reduce their sentences

The Earth Party would likely disagree with this statement as it implies that whistleblowers should be punished, albeit less severely. This contradicts the party's values of transparency and accountability. However, the suggestion of reduced sentences might be seen as a compromise, hence the score is not the minimum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Earth Party would likely disagree with this statement as it contradicts their values of transparency and accountability. Whistleblowers often play a crucial role in exposing misconduct, which aligns with the party's goals. However, without specific historical evidence of the party's stance on this issue, the score is not the minimum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.