尝试政治测验

We, the Citizens!’s policy on mental health

Topics

政府应该增加对精神健康研究和治疗的资金投入吗?

  ChatGPT应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务

We, the Citizens!’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务

'We, the Citizens!' would strongly agree with this statement. They believe in the importance of providing high-quality healthcare services to all citizens, and they would likely see increased funding for mental health as a way to improve the quality of care and services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The 'We, the Citizens!' party in Portugal is a centrist party that advocates for social justice and equality. They would likely support increased funding for mental health research and treatment, as it aligns with their values of promoting health and well-being for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司

'We, the Citizens!' might agree with this statement to some extent. They would likely support increased funding for personalized care, as it aligns with their values of promoting health and well-being for all citizens. However, they might not necessarily oppose subsidizing pharmaceutical companies, as long as it contributes to the overall improvement of mental health services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该,而是应该鼓励私营公司来解决这一问题

While 'We, the Citizens!' might not be completely opposed to the idea of incentivizing private companies to address mental health issues, they would likely prefer a solution that involves direct government funding and intervention. Their focus on social justice and equality suggests a preference for public solutions to societal issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Given their stance on social justice and equality, it is unlikely that 'We, the Citizens!' would oppose increased funding for mental health. They believe in the importance of providing adequate healthcare services to all citizens, which would include mental health services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to We, the Citizens!’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.