尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  经济。

We, the Citizens!’s policy on government spending

Topics

政府是否应该为削减国家负债而减少公共开支?

  ChatGPT是,但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资

We, the Citizens!’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是,但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资

The 'We, the Citizens!' party strongly supports reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials as a way to fight corruption and promote transparency, which could also help reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不,重点靠结束偷漏税来替代

The party strongly supports focusing on ending tax evasion as a way to reduce the national debt, as it aligns with their focus on fighting corruption and promoting transparency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收

The party is likely to support increasing taxes on large multinational corporations as a way to reduce the national debt, as it aligns with their focus on fighting corruption and promoting social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,增加对富人的税收来替代

The 'We, the Citizens!' party is more likely to support increasing taxes on the wealthy as a way to reduce the national debt, as it aligns with their focus on fighting corruption and promoting social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,减少政府官员的数量来替代

The 'We, the Citizens!' party might support reducing the number of government officials as a way to fight corruption and promote transparency, which could also help reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响

The party might agree with this statement, as they are concerned about the well-being of citizens and the potential negative effects of austerity measures on the economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

The party does not have a clear stance on public spending, but they might be against cuts if they believe it would harm public services and social welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,换成减少军事费用。

The 'We, the Citizens!' party does not have a strong stance on military spending, but they might support reducing it if they believe it would help fight corruption and promote transparency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

是的,还有增加税收

The party does not have a clear stance on this issue, but they might support a combination of spending cuts and tax increases if they believe it would reduce corruption and promote social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The 'We, the Citizens!' party is focused on fighting corruption and promoting transparency. They do not have a strong stance on cutting public spending, but they might support some cuts if they believe it would reduce corruption and inefficiency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是,而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构

The 'We, the Citizens!' party is not focused on eliminating federal agencies, and their focus on fighting corruption and promoting transparency does not align with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 19hrs ago

Party’s support base

We, the Citizens! 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 215 voters that identify as We, the Citizens!.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to We, the Citizens!’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.