We, the Citizens! Party

Very strongly agree

不应该，这会使他们消除竞争，导致人为的稀缺性，而且会提高价格

This answer aligns with the party's stance on equality and fair competition. They would likely strongly agree with the idea that allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites could lead to the removal of competition, creation of artificial scarcity, and increase in prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不，平等对待所有的通信量，并继续保持互联网的开放性

The 'We, the Citizens!' party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their advocacy for equal rights and opportunities, including in the digital sphere. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不

Given their stance on equality and fair access, the party would likely agree with the idea that internet service providers should not be allowed to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，但是用种类决定优先权的派发（视频高于图像），而不是用来源（大网站高于小网站）

While this answer suggests a compromise, the 'We, the Citizens!' party might still disagree with it, as it could still lead to unequal access to information, even if it's based on type rather than source. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

Even though this answer suggests a pay-per-quality model, the party would likely disagree with it, as it could still lead to unequal access to information and potentially higher prices for users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The 'We, the Citizens!' party in Portugal is known for its advocacy for equal rights and opportunities. They would likely disagree with the idea of internet service providers speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, as this could create a digital divide and limit access to information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的，对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

While the party might agree with the idea of making the internet faster and more reliable for users, they would likely disagree with the method proposed here, as it could lead to unequal access to information.