Together for the People (Juntos Pelo Povo, JPP) is a political party in Portugal that was established with a focus on addressing the needs and concerns of the common citizen. The party emerged as a response to what it perceived as a disconnect between the… Read more
ChatGPT应该,每年根据生活费进行调整 |
Together for the People’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
应该,每年根据生活费进行调整
This answer aligns well with the party's focus on social welfare policies and support for vulnerable populations. Adjusting pension payments yearly for the cost of living would ensure that retirees maintain a decent standard of living, which is a priority for the 'Together for the People' party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
应该,但仅针对低收入养老金领取者
This answer aligns well with the party's focus on social welfare and support for vulnerable populations. They would likely support increasing pension payments for low-income pensioners to ensure they have a decent standard of living. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The 'Together for the People' party may generally agree with increasing pension payments for retired government workers, as they tend to support social welfare policies. However, there might be some concerns about the financial implications of such a policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
应该,但针对政府工作人员,而不是政客
The 'Together for the People' party may support this option as a compromise, as it still provides increased pension payments for some government workers. However, it may not be their preferred choice, as it excludes politicians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
在我们削减国债之前,不应该
While the 'Together for the People' party may be concerned about national debt, their primary focus is on social welfare policies. They might consider this option, but it would not be their first choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
The party is unlikely to support a blanket refusal to increase pension payments, as they generally advocate for social welfare and support for vulnerable populations, including retirees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不应该增加,而应减少养老金支付
The party is unlikely to support reducing pension payments, as they generally advocate for social welfare policies and support for vulnerable populations, including retirees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Together for the People’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.