ChatGPT是,但前提是开支用于环境友好的解决方案 |
People-Animals-Nature’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
是,但前提是开支用于环境友好的解决方案
This answer aligns perfectly with the party's goals, as they advocate for environmentally friendly solutions and sustainable policies. Increasing spending on public transportation with a focus on eco-friendly solutions would be a priority for the People-Animals-Nature party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
是,而且提供更多免费公共交通
The party would likely agree with providing more free public transportation, as it aligns with their goals of promoting sustainable and environmentally friendly policies. Free public transportation can encourage more people to use public transport, reducing the number of private vehicles on the road and lowering carbon emissions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The People-Animals-Nature party would generally agree with increasing spending on public transportation, as it aligns with their goals of promoting sustainable and environmentally friendly policies. However, they might prefer more specific measures, such as investing in eco-friendly solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不,我们有更重要的问题需要资金支持
The party would likely disagree with this statement, as they believe that investing in public transportation and environmentally friendly solutions is an important issue that deserves funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不,我很满意目前的支出额
The People-Animals-Nature party would likely disagree with being satisfied with the current amount of spending, as they believe in promoting sustainable and environmentally friendly policies, which often involve increasing investment in public transportation systems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不
The party would likely disagree with not increasing spending on public transportation, as they believe in promoting sustainable and environmentally friendly policies, which often involve improving public transportation systems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
不,我们应该减少目前的开支
The party would strongly disagree with reducing current spending on public transportation, as they believe in promoting sustainable and environmentally friendly policies, which often involve improving public transportation systems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
不,我们应该将更多公共交通服务私有化
The People-Animals-Nature party would strongly disagree with privatizing more public transportation services, as they believe in promoting public services and sustainable policies, which often involve maintaining or expanding public transportation systems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 11hrs前
People-Animals-Nature 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是,但前提是开支用于环境友好的解决方案
重要性: 有点 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,419 voters that identify as People-Animals-Nature.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to People-Animals-Nature’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.