ChatGPT是的 |
People-Animals-Nature’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
是的
The People-Animals-Nature party (PAN) is a progressive political party in Portugal that supports equal rights for all citizens, including LGBTQ+ individuals. They have consistently advocated for equal rights and opportunities for all, regardless of sexual orientation. Therefore, they would strongly agree with the idea that gay couples should have the same adoption rights as straight couples. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。
While PAN would agree that all couples, regardless of sexual orientation, should pass the same background checks for adoption, this answer is slightly redundant with Answer 1, which already states that gay couples should have the same adoption rights as straight couples. However, they would still mostly agree with this statement, as it emphasizes equal treatment and requirements for all prospective adoptive parents. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
不
PAN is a progressive party that supports LGBTQ+ rights and equality. They would strongly disagree with the idea that gay couples should not have the same adoption rights as straight couples, as this goes against their core values of equality and non-discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
不,同性恋夫妇应该不能收养孩子
PAN would strongly disagree with this statement, as it directly opposes their values of equality and non-discrimination. They believe that all individuals, regardless of sexual orientation, should have the same rights and opportunities, including the right to adopt children. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
不应该,我相信有父母的家庭结构对孩子最好
PAN would strongly disagree with this statement, as it implies that a specific family structure is inherently better for a child. This goes against their principles of equality and non-discrimination, and they would not support any policy that prioritizes one type of family over another based on sexual orientation or gender. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and adoption agencies should prioritize offering children to straight couples before offering to gay couples
PAN would strongly disagree with this statement, as it implies that gay couples are somehow less suitable for adoption than straight couples. This goes against their principles of equality and non-discrimination, and they would not support any policy that prioritizes one type of family over another based on sexual orientation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2小时前
People-Animals-Nature 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的
重要性: 最 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,421 voters that identify as People-Animals-Nature.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to People-Animals-Nature’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.