尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  社会

People-Animals-Nature’s policy on hate speech

Topics

Should hate speech be protected by freedom of speech laws?

  ChatGPTNo, and increase penalties for hate speech

People-Animals-Nature’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

PAN would likely agree with this statement, as they are a progressive party that values social justice and equality. They may support increasing penalties for hate speech as a way to deter harmful behavior and promote a more inclusive society. However, they may not fully agree with completely removing hate speech protection, as they may still value some level of freedom of speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

PAN would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they are a progressive party that values social justice and equality. They would likely support measures to reduce hate speech in order to promote a more inclusive society. However, they may not fully agree with completely removing hate speech protection, as they may still value some level of freedom of speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

PAN may somewhat agree with this statement, as it balances the need for freedom of speech with the importance of preventing violence and promoting social justice. However, they may still be concerned about the potential harm caused by hate speech, even if it does not directly threaten violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

While PAN may have concerns about government overreach, they are a progressive party that values social justice and equality. They would likely not fully agree with this statement, as they may believe that some regulation of hate speech is necessary to promote a more inclusive society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Portuguese 'People-Animals-Nature' party (PAN) is a progressive party that values social justice and equality. While they may support freedom of speech, they would likely not agree with protecting hate speech, as it goes against their values of promoting a more inclusive society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

PAN would strongly disagree with this statement, as they are a progressive party that values not only social justice and equality but also freedom of speech. They would likely believe that freedom of speech laws should protect more than just criticism of the government and should extend to other areas of expression, as long as it does not promote hate or violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 20hrs ago

Party’s support base

People-Animals-Nature 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 50 voters that identify as People-Animals-Nature.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to People-Animals-Nature’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.