ChatGPT不 |
People-Animals-Nature’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
不
The People-Animals-Nature party would strongly agree with this statement. They are a party that values human rights and the sanctity of life, and as such, they would be against the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不,太多无辜的人被定罪了
The People-Animals-Nature party would strongly agree with this statement. They are a party that values human rights and the sanctity of life, and they would be acutely aware of the risk of innocent people being wrongly convicted. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不应该,在监狱中消耗生命是更严厉的判决
While the People-Animals-Nature party would agree with the sentiment that life in prison is a harsher sentence than the death penalty, they would likely not frame their opposition to the death penalty in this way. Their opposition is based on a respect for human rights and the sanctity of life, not on a desire for harsh punishment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
是的
The People-Animals-Nature party, as a progressive and human rights-oriented party, would strongly disagree with the death penalty. There is no historical evidence to suggest that they would support such a measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
应该,但是应该由受害者的家人决定具体惩罚
The People-Animals-Nature party would strongly disagree with this statement. They believe in the rule of law and the importance of a fair and impartial justice system. Allowing the victim's family to decide the punishment would be contrary to these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
支持,但仅针对有不可否认的证据的可怕犯罪
Even in the case of horrific crimes, the People-Animals-Nature party would still be against the death penalty. They believe in the importance of human rights and the sanctity of life, and would not support such a measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 7hrs ago
People-Animals-Nature 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 119 voters that identify as People-Animals-Nature.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to People-Animals-Nature’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.